"L19K was synthesized by CPC Scientific and comprised the sequence NO2A-PEG4-GGNECDIARMWEWECFERK-CONH2, with Cys-Cys disulfide bridge and polyethylene glycol (PEG4) as a spacer between peptide and chelator. "
Abstract
Imaging agents based on peptide probes have desirable pharmacokinetic properties provided that they have high affinities for their target in vivo. An approach to improve a peptide ligand’s affinity for its target is to make this interaction covalent and irreversible. For this purpose, we evaluated a 64Cu-labeled affinity peptide tag, 64Cu-L19K-(5-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene) (64Cu-L19K-FDNB), which binds covalently and irreversibly to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a PET imaging agent. We compared the in vivo properties of 64Cu-L19K-FDNB in VEGF-expressing tumor xenografts with its noncovalent binding analogs, 64Cu-L19K-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) (64Cu-L19K-DNP) and 64Cu-L19K. Methods: The L19K peptide (GGNECDIARMWEWECFERK-CONH2) was constructed with 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid at the N terminus for radiolabeling with 64Cu with a polyethylene glycol spacer between peptide and chelate. 1,5-difluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene was conjugated at the C-terminal lysine for cross-linking to VEGF, resulting in L19K-FDNB. 64Cu-L19K-FDNB was assayed for covalent binding to VEGF in vitro. As a control, L19K was conjugated to 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, resulting in L19K-DNP. PET imaging and biodistribution studies of 64Cu-L19K-FDNB, 64Cu-L19K-DNP, and the native 64Cu-L19K were compared in HCT-116 xenografts. Blocking studies of 64Cu-L19K-FDNB was performed with a coinjection of excess unlabeled L19K-FDNB. Results: In vitro binding studies confirmed the covalent and irreversible binding of 64Cu-L19K-FDNB to VEGF, whereas 64Cu-L19K-DNP and 64Cu-L19K did not bind covalently. PET imaging showed higher tumor uptake with 64Cu-L19K-FDNB than with 64Cu-L19K-DNP and 64Cu-L19K, with mean standardized uptake values of 0.62 ± 0.05, 0.18 ± 0.06, and 0.34 ± 0.14, respectively, at 24 h after injection (P < 0.05), and 0.53 ± 0.05, 0.32 ± 0.14, and 0.30 ± 0.09, respectively, at 48 h after injection (P < 0.05). Blocking studies with 64Cu-L19K-FDNB in the presence of excess unlabeled peptide showed a 53% reduction in tumor uptake at 48 h after injection. Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept study, the use of a covalent binding peptide ligand against VEGF improves tracer accumulation at the tumor site in vivo, compared with its noncovalent binding peptide analogs. This technique is a promising tool to enhance the potency of peptide probes as imaging agents.
SOCIAL MEDIA
Connect with us and stay updated by following our social media channels.
Latest Briefings from our Knowledge Center
Press Releases, Industry News, Articles, and Technical Content
Solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) has many advantages over liquid-phase peptide synthesis (LPPS) for preparing and manufacturing synthetic peptides. Except the synthesis of short peptide sequences (i.e., less than five amino acid residues), SPPS is faster, more efficient, and more economical than liquid-phase peptide synthesis (LPPS). Some of the advantages of SPPS include: (1) Excess reagents and products can be easily washed away, (2) using excess reagents to increase reaction rates and drive reactions to completion, (3) intermediates do not require isolation or characterization, (4) access to a broader range of solvents with low volatility and high polarity, (5) tethered peptide provides a ‘pseudo-dilute’ microenvironment, which can inhibit intermolecular reactions, making some modifications easier to accomplish, and (6) compatibility with automated synthesis technology.
Lo, J.H., Hao, L., Muzumdar, M.D., Raghavan, S., Kwon, E.J., Pulver, E.M., Hsu, F., Aguirre, A.J., Wolpin, B.M., Fuchs, C.S. and Hahn, W.C. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics 17, no. 11 (2018): 2377-2388.
pTP-TAMRA-iRGD (CH3(CH)15-[GWTLNSAGYLLGKINLKALAALAKKIL-GGK(TAMRA)GGCRGDKGPDC, Cys-Cys bridge]) used in all figures except Fig. S1 was synthesized by CPC Scientific.
Ng, Ee Xien, Myat Noe Hsu, Guoyun Sun, and Chia-Hung Chen. Methods in Enzymology 628 (2019): 59-94.
The peptide sequences of the four FRET-based substrates ([..] CPC Scientific) are as follows: UV: AlexaFluor405-Leu-Ala-Gln-Ala-HompheArg-Ser-Lys (QSY35)-NH2; Blue: Dabcyl-Gly-Pro-Leu-Gly-Met-Arg-Gly-Lys (5-FAM)-NH2; Green: QSY7-Ala-Pro-Phe-Glu..
West, J.A., Tsakmaki, A., Huang, J.H., Ghosh, S.S., Parkes, D.G., Wismann, P., Rigbolt, K.T., Pedersen, P.J., Pavlidis, P., Maggs, D. and Lopez-Talavera, J.C. bioRxiv (2019) 822122.
- Fractyl Laboratories Inc, Lexington, MA, 02421, USA
- Diabetes Research Group, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Science and Medicine, King’s College London, London, WC2R 2LS, England, UK
[..] infusion of vehicle 2 via osmotic minipump; (2) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist (0.2 mg/kg liraglutide, SC, QD, Victoza (Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) and continuous infusion of vehicle 2 via osmotic minipump; (3) vehicle 1 (SC, QD) and continuous infusion of a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) antagonist (∼4.5 mg/kg/day / 56.8 nmol/kg/h GIP[3-30]NH2, CPC Scientific Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) via osmotic minipump;
Artur Javmen, Vladimir Y. Toshchakov, et al. Journal of Leukocyte Biology (2019).
All CPDPs included the N‐terminal Antennapedia homeodomain sequence RQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK.38 The Cy3‐labeled peptides were produced by CPC Scientific (Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The Cy3 label was placed at the peptide N‐terminus..
Gilles, Maud-Emmanuelle, Slack, Frank J, et al. Oncotarget, 2019, Vol. 10, (No. 51), pp: 5349-5358
"Tandem peptide (pTP-iRGD: CH3(CH)15-GWTLNSAGYLLGKINLKALAALAKKIL-GGK(TAMRA)GGCRGDKGPDC, Cys-Cys bridge) was synthesized by CPC Scientific."
Garner, Thomas P., Dulguun Amgalan, Denis E. Reyna, Sheng Li, Richard N. Kitsis, and Evripidis Gavathiotis. Nature Chemical Biology 15, no. 4 (2019): 322.
"Hydrocarbon-stapled peptides corresponding to the BH3 domain of BIM, BIM SAHBA2: N-acetylated- and FITC-Ahx-EIWIAQELRS5IGDS5FNAYYA-CONH2, where S5 represents the non-natural amino acid inserted for olefin metathesis, were synthesized, purified at >95% purity by CPC Scientific Inc. and characterized as previously described."
Gibbs, Ebrima, Judith M. Silverman, Beibei Zhao, Xubiao Peng, Jing Wang, Cheryl L. Wellington, Ian R. Mackenzie, Steven S. Plotkin, Johanne M. Kaplan, and Neil R. Cashman. Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 1-14.
The conformational epitope was synthesized as a cyclic peptide with additional N-terminal residues CG and a C-terminal G to recapitulate the predicted structure of HHQK on AβO. Peptide synthesis was performed by CPC Scientific Inc. (Sunnyvale CA, USA) [..] Cyclization was performed via a head-to-tail (C-G) amide bond and c[CGHHQKG] was then conjugated to either keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) or bovine serum albumin (BSA) via maleimide-based coupling.
SUNNYVALE, US. and Hangzhou, China, June 24th, 2019 /CPCNewswire/ — CPC Scientific Inc. and its affiliate Chinese Peptide Company, a public Hangzhou-based CDMO (Stock Symbol: 002390) is pleased to announce today that their GMP manufacturing facility, has successfully passed its inspection by the competent authority of Germany as an“active substance manufacturer that has been inspected […]